What is the difference between personal data vs. bibliographic metadata
Secondary declaration metadata may contain title or product metadata, which may include information such as an author name, the personal or artistic names of content creators or musicians.
The question of whether bibliographic data, such as the author’s name, are considered “personal data” under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is highly dependable on the specific context and on how the data is collected, processed, and used.
The GDPR defines “personal data” as broadly as possible, including any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. An identifiable natural person may be identified directly or indirectly, by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier. Identification may also happen due to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural, or social identity of that natural person.
In general, bibliographic data such as an author name would likely be considered personal data under the GDPR regime if it can be linked to an individual person, and the data is being processed.
However, if the bibliographic data is published and available in public domain, this act would represent consent to the specific use. The GDPR states that data made public by the data subject is not subject to protection anymore.
Source: Ministry of Education and Culture, Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-781-9
Last updated